Current:Home > MyJudge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation -InvestPioneer
Judge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation
View
Date:2025-04-26 10:45:49
A federal judge on Thursday struck down a Biden administration policy that aimed to ease a path to citizenship for some undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.
The program, lauded as one of the biggest presidential actions to help immigrant families in years, allowed undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens to apply for a green card without first having to leave the country.
The temporary relief from deportation brought a brief sense of security to some 500,000 immigrants estimated to benefit from the program before Texas-based U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker put it on hold in August, days after applicants filed their paperwork.
Barker ruled Thursday that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by implementing the program and had stretched the legal interpretation of relevant immigration law “past its breaking point.”
The short-lived Biden administration initiative known as “Keeping Families Together” would have been unlikely to remain in place after Donald Trump took office in January. But its early termination creates greater uncertainty for immigrant families as many are bracing for Trump’s return to the White House.
Trump’s election victory this week sets the stage for a swift crackdown on undocumented individuals after the Republican ran on promises of “mass deportation.” The president-elect energized his supporters on the campaign trail with a litany anti-immigrant statements, including that immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the nation.
During his first term, Trump appointed Barker as a judge in Tyler, Texas, which lies in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a favored venue for advocates pushing conservative arguments.
Barker had placed the immigration initiative on hold after Texas and 15 other states, led by their Republican attorneys general, filed a legal challenge accusing the executive branch of bypassing Congress to help immigrant families for “blatant political purposes.”
Republicans argued the initiative created costs for their states and could draw more migrants to the U.S.
The policy would have applied to people who have been living continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, do not pose a security threat and have utilized the existing legal authority known as “parole in place” that offers deportation protections.
Those married to a citizen by June 17, the day before the program was announced, could pay a $580 application fee and fill out a lengthy application explaining why they deserve humanitarian parole. If approved, applicants would have three years to seek permanent residency and obtain work authorization.
It was not immediately clear Thursday whether anyone had received approval under the program, which only accepted applications for about a week before the federal judge placed it on hold.
Noncitizen spouses are already eligible for legal status but often have to apply from their home countries. The process typically includes a years-long wait outside of the U.S., which can separate family members with different immigration statuses.
veryGood! (6619)
Related
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Save $28 on This TikTok-Famous Strivectin Tightening Neck Cream Before Prime Day 2023 Ends
- Holiday Traditions in the Forest Revive Spiritual Relationships with Nature, and Heal Planetary Wounds
- ESPYS 2023 Red Carpet Fashion: See Every Look as the Stars Arrive
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Q&A: California Drilling Setback Law Suspended by Oil Industry Ballot Maneuver. The Law’s Author Won’t Back Down
- The Capitol Christmas Tree Provides a Timely Reminder on Environmental Stewardship This Holiday Season
- Navigator’s Proposed Carbon Pipeline Struggles to Gain Support in Illinois
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Exxon Accurately Predicted Global Warming, Years Before Casting Doubt on Climate Science
Ranking
- Sam Taylor
- Barbie has biggest opening day of 2023, Oppenheimer not far behind
- Kim Zolciak Spotted Wearing Wedding Ring After Calling Off Divorce From Kroy Biermann
- Texas Project Will Use Wind to Make Fuel Out of Water
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
- What Lego—Yes, Lego—Can Teach Us About Avoiding Energy Project Boondoggles
- The Surprising History of Climate Change Coverage in College Textbooks
Recommendation
The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
Coal Ash Along the Shores of the Great Lakes Threatens Water Quality as Residents Rally for Change
Amazon Prime Day 2023 Last Call Deals: Vital Proteins, Ring Doorbell, Bose, COSRX, iRobot, Olaplex & More
To Save the Vaquita Porpoise, Conservationists Entreat Mexico to Keep Gillnets Out of the Northern Gulf of California
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Why Khloe Kardashian Forgives Tristan Thompson for Multiple Cheating Scandals
Peacock hikes streaming prices for first time since launch in 2020
Fracking Wastewater Causes Lasting Harm to Key Freshwater Species